FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
	Sheri Layral
	312 Signers' Hall
	474-7964   FYSENAT
For Audioconferencing:  Bridge #:  1-877-751-8040
					(Passcode:  523297)
				Fairbanks:  474-8050
					(Chair's Passcode:  628337)
A G E N D A
UAF FACULTY SENATE MEETING #99
Monday, February 5, 2001
1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.
Wood Center Ballroom
1:30	I	Call to Order - Larry Duffy   			  5 Min.
		A.	Roll Call
		B.	Approval of Minutes to Meeting #98
		C.	Adoption of Agenda
1:35	II	Status of Chancellor's Office Actions 		  5 Min.
		A.	Motions Approved:  
			1.	Motion to amend the BBA degree 
				requirements.  
			2.	Motion to approve a M.S. degree program 
				in Statistics
			3.	Motion to replaced the existing Dual 
				Enrollment policy with a new Secondary 
				Student Enrollment policy.
		B.	Motions Pending:  
			4.	Motion recommending that the "Guidelines 
				for the Evaluation Process for 
				Administrators" be adopted. (A request 
				for a 90 day extension was approved by 
				the Administrative Committee.  Will be 
				replaced by substitute motion.)
1:40	III	A.	Remarks by Chancellor M. Lind   	10 Min.
		B.	Remarks by Provost P. Reichardt		10 Min.
		C.	Guest Speaker  - George Happ  		10 Min.
			   Project Director, EPSCoR
2:10	IV	Governance Reports
	A.	ASUAF -S. Banks / GSO - 		    	  5 Min.
	B.	Staff Council - S. Culbertson 			  5 Min.
	C.	President's Report - L. Duffy    		  5 Min.
			(Attachment 99/1)
2:25	V	Consent Agenda
	A.	Motion to amend Section 3 (Article V:  Committees, 
		Standing, Permanent) of the Bylaws by deleting E. 9.
		(Attachment 99/2)
2:25	VI	New Business					20 Min.
	A.	Motion to approve the Certificate and A.A.S. 
		degree program in Dental Assistant, submitted 
		by Curricular Affairs (Attachment 99/3)
	B.	Motion to approve the Certificate and A.A.S. 
		degree program in Tribal Management, submitted 
		by Curricular Affairs (Attachment 99/4)
	C.	Motion to amend the Foreign Language Advanced 
		Placement Credit policy, submitted by Curricular 
		Affairs  (Attachment 99/5)
	D.	Motion to recommend UAF Administrators be 
		reviewed according to Guidelines, submitted by 
		Faculty Appeals & Oversight Committee 
		(Attachment 99/6)
2:45	VII	Committee Reports 				15 Min.
	A.	Curricular Affairs - R. Illingworth (Attachment 99/7)
	B.	Faculty Affairs - P. McRoy (Attachment 99/8)
	C.	Graduate Academic & Advisory Committee - J. Gardner
			(Attachment 99/9)
	D.	Core Review - J. Brown
	E.	Curriculum Review - S. Bandopadhyay
	F.	Developmental Studies - J. Weber (Attachment 99/10)
	G.	Faculty Appeals & Oversight - G. Chukwu 
			(Attachment 99/11)
	H.	Faculty Development, Assessment & Improvement - 
			T. Robinson (Attachment 99/12)
3:00		***BREAK***					10 Min
3:10	VIII	Public Comments/Questions 			10 Min.
3:20	IX	Discussion Items   			 	 5 Min.
	A.	Academic Liaison Faculty Fellow - Call for Nominations
		(Attachment 99/13)
3:25	X	Members' Comments/Questions			  5 Min.
3:30	XI	Adjournment
**
ATTACHMENT 99/1
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
President's Comments - Larry Duffy
Welcome to the 21st Century.  
During January, President Mark Hamilton led a two-day meeting of UA 
administrators, deans, and the Faculty Alliance.  A wide variety of topics 
were reviewed and discussed with most of the focus on the initiative 
program.  It became clear than an academic plan should be the driver for 
the initiative process and that UAF, UAA and UAS have or are 
developing these plans for the next 5 years.  President Hamilton also 
urged us to change our conservative financial culture to take advantage 
of the opportunities arising around the University.  We should not dwell 
on the past, and although success is likely, we should at least have an 
attitude that, if we do fail, it will be going forward.
At UAF, we are in a great position to heed President Hamilton�s advice.  
We have a new Mission Statement; the Strategic Plan UAF 2005 is 
about ready to come to the Senate; an Academic Development Plan has 
been created; and an insightful accreditation self-study has been 
drafted by Ron Gatterdam, Dana Thomas and colleagues.  It is time for 
us in Governance to support this effort by encouraging the entire 
faculty in the units we represent to get involved.  As UAF is revitalized, 
our goal should be to revitalize the Senate and its committees.
**
ATTACHMENT 99/2
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
SUBMITTED BY ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
MOTION
======
The UAF Faculty Senate moves to amend Section 3 (Article V:  
Committees, Standing, Permanent) of the Bylaws by deleting E. 9. 
(Steering Committee, Bachelor of Arts and Sciences Degree Program).
[[   ]]  = 	Deletion
CAPS  = 	Additions
STANDING
A.	An Administrative Committee will be composed of the 
	chairpersons of all standing Senate Committees and of 
	permanent Senate committees except [[the University-wide 
	Promotion and Tenure Committee,]] the Committee to Nominate 
	Commencement Speakers and Honorary Degree Recipients. 
	[[, and the BAS Steering Committee.  ]]
PERMANENT
[[9. 	The BAS Steering Committee is responsible for overseeing the 
	BAS degree program.  Specific duties of the Committee include:  
	1) evaluating proposals for including or deleting courses within 
	the BAS degree and making recommendations to the CLA 
	Academic Council and the Faculty Senate; 2) developing and 
	evaluating procedures for advising BAS majors; 3) developing 
	and assessing the BAS degree program.  The Committee is 
	responsible for establishing procedures for selecting the BAS 
	coordinator and will select the coordinator for a 2-year term.
	The committee shall be composed of one faculty member elected 
	from each of the following units:  (CLA, CSEM, SOEd, CRA); one 
	faculty member appointed by Faculty Senate; one representative 
	from the Advising Center; the BAS coordinator; and the Dean of 
	the School of Education and the CLA dean or dean designee as 
	ex-officio members.  ]]
	EFFECTIVE:  	Immediately
	RATIONALE:  	The School of Education is now responsible for 
		the establishment of an advisory council for the BAS 
		degree.  The Colleges of Liberal Arts and Science, 
		Engineering and Mathematics will be responsible for 
		providing faculty members for the advisory council.  
**
ATTACHMENT 99/3
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
SUBMITTED BY CURRICULAR AFFAIRS
MOTION
======
The UAF Faculty Senate moves to approve the Certificate and A.A.S. 
degree program in Dental Assistant Program which includes six new 
courses.  
	EFFECTIVE:  	Fall 2001 
			Upon Board of Regents' Approval
	RATIONALE: 	See full program proposal #35-40 and 
		#41-42 on file in the Governance Office, 312 Signers� Hall.
				
	SUBMITTED BY COLLEGE OF RURAL ALASKA
	(Submitted by Health Technology)
35.	NEW COURSE:  HLTH 152 - Dental Materials and Applications 
	(2+4) 4 credits; offered As Demand Warrants; effective 
	Fall 2001 or Upon BOR Approval.
36.	NEW COURSE:  HLTH 153 - Biomedical Sciences for Dental 
	Assistants (3+0) 3 credits; offered Spring and As Demand 
	Warrants; effective Fall 2001 or Upon BOR Approval.
37.	NEW COURSE:  HLTH 251 - Clinical Chairside 1 for Dental 
	Assistants (2+4) 4 credits; offered As Demand Warrants; 
	effective Fall 2001 or Upon BOR Approval.
38.	NEW COURSE:  HLTH 252 - Clinical Chairside 2 for Dental 
	Assistants (2+4) 4 credits; offered As Demand Warrants; 
	effective Fall 2001 or Upon BOR Approval.
39.	NEW COURSE:  HLTH 253 - Clinical Chairside 3 for Dental 
	Assistants (2+4) 4 credits; offered As Demand Warrants; 
	effective Fall 2001 or Upon BOR Approval.
40.	NEW COURSE:  HLTH 254 - Dental Assistant Practicum (1+12) 
	4 credits; offered As Demand Warrants; effective Fall 2001 
	or Upon BOR Approval.
				
Executive Summary
Certificate & A.A.S., Dental Assistant Program
The field of dentistry has expanded in recent years.  The Dental 
Assistant Certificate and A.A.S. degree program is designed to 
incorporate theory and application.  This focused delivery will provide 
the student with the knowledge and job skills required for entry-level 
employment in the dental field.  
There is a current and future need for trained dental assistant.  In a 
September 2000 analysis of employment of health care occupations in 
91ÊÓÆµ from 1998-2008, the 91ÊÓÆµ Department of Labor and 
Workforce Development project a 64% increase in estimated growth of 
dental assisting positions in 91ÊÓÆµ.  This reflects an annual growth of 
6.44% per year, for the next eight years.  In a report prepared for the 
Human Resource Investment Council titled:  University of 91ÊÓÆµ 
Vocational Education Students FY 1998 -- Employment Earnings Before 
and After Training, student incomes were studied.  Statistics showed 
that after successfully completing a dental assisting program there was 
a significant rise in total wage and salary earnings.  
Dental health care delivery is changing.  Dentists are being challenged to 
deliver quality patient care as well as contain the rising costs.  Managed 
care programs, patients loss of dental insurance and reduction in 
benefits, cost containment measures, and community pressure have 
amplified the market for competent and cross-trained dental assistants.  
Hiring Certified Dental Assistants allows the dentist to delegate 
advanced functions and thus extends dental services to more people.
To summarize, there is a current need for educated dental assistants, 
which is projected to extend into the foreseeable future.  The proposed 
Dental Assistant Certificate & A.A.S. program will prepare students for 
employment in the dental field.  Following accreditation of the program, 
the graduates will be eligible to take the D.A.N.B. Certification 
examination.  The modular format also provides early entry into the job 
market with completion of specific modules of the course work.  This 
permits full time work while the student completes the remaining 
modules.  Implementation of this program will position the College of 
Rural 91ÊÓÆµ, Tanana Valley Campus to meet the present and increasing 
demand for vocational-technical training and provide the dental 
community with credentialed dental assistants.  
**
ATTACHMENT 99/4
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
SUBMITTED BY CURRICULAR AFFAIRS
MOTION
======
The UAF Faculty Senate moves to approve the Certificate and A.A.S. 
degree program in Tribal Management Program which includes six new 
courses.  
	EFFECTIVE:  	Fall 2001 
			Upon Board of Regents' Approval
	RATIONALE: 	See full program proposal #48-53 and 
		#54-55 on file in the Governance Office, 312 Signers� Hall.
				
	SUBMITTED BY COLLEGE OF RURAL ALASKA
	(Submitted by Tribal Management)
48.	NEW COURSE:  TM 101 - Introduction to Tribal Government 
	(3+0) 3 credits; offered Fall; effective Fall 2001 or 
	Upon BOR Approval.
49.	NEW COURSE:  TM 105 - Introduction to Tribal Finance 
	Applications (3+0) 3 credits; offered Spring; effective 
	Fall 2001 or Upon BOR Approval.
50.	NEW COURSE:  TM 199 - Tribal Management Practicum I, 
	3 credits; offered Fall and Spring; effective Fall 2001 
	or Upon BOR Approval.
51.	NEW COURSE:  TM 201 - Advanced Tribal Government (3+0) 
	3 credits; offered Spring; effective Fall 2001 or 
	Upon BOR Approval.
52.	NEW COURSE:  TM 205 - Advanced Tribal Finance Applications 
	(3+0) 3 credits; offered Fall; effective Fall 2001 
	or Upon BOR Approval.
53.	NEW COURSE:  TM 299 - Tribal Management Practicum II, 
	3 credits; offered Fall and Spring; effective Fall 2001 or 
	Upon BOR Approval.
				
Executive Summary
Certificate & A.A.S., Tribal Management Program
The Interior-Aleutians Campus, College of Rural 91ÊÓÆµ, University of 
91ÊÓÆµ Fairbanks, request approval of a Certificate and A.A.S. degree 
program in Tribal Management to be implemented in Fall Semester 
2001.  
Through courses delivered locally in the home communities of our 
students, the Tribal Management Program will build the capacity of local 
governments in rural 91ÊÓÆµ villages to take control of assets and 
resources for economic enhancement.  
In line with the mission of Interior-Aleutians Campus, the TMP will 
provide educational opportunities for students throughout the state 
without requiring them to change or leave their culture or heritage.  The 
Interior-Aleutians Campus is committed to educating 91ÊÓÆµ Natives and 
rural residents, assisting them to affect social changes in their 
communities, thereby enriching the quality of their lives and cultures.  
Particular consideration is given to the needs of permanent residents 
and students in non-traditional settings who seek skills and degrees 
suited to the rural economy and to the well being of rural communities.  
Due to the boom and bust cycles of 91ÊÓÆµ's economic history, coupled 
with the thrust of Native peoples into the corporate world, many skills 
have been "imported" to regions by persons outside of the community 
and most often outside of the state.  Many rural areas exist in a 
technology deficit, and the residents are becoming part of a "have-not" 
society.  Given the lack of opportunity for education and employment as 
well as an infrastructure of tools for educational use, this challenge is 
especially poignant.  The Tribal Management program is an oppor-tunity 
for students in rural 91ÊÓÆµ to attain and maintain skills that sustain 
wellness, self-sufficiency, and on-going economic development.  
As 91ÊÓÆµn tribes and rural workforce take control of local resources and 
the local economy, we will continue to see a rise in the need for quality 
and relevant education in rural 91ÊÓÆµ.  As more jobs are created to 
meet the economic demand of rural government and business 
development, there will be a growing need for adequate skill 
development programs.  Working in cooperation with organizations like 
the Tanana Chiefs Conference, Bristol Bay Native Association and other 
regional nonprofits throughout 91ÊÓÆµ increases the probability of 
success for the Tribal Management Program.  
**
ATTACHMENT 99/5
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
SUBMITTED BY CURRICULAR AFFAIRS
MOTION:
======
The UAF Faculty Senate moves to amend the Foreign Language 
Advanced Placement Credit policy (pp. 14-15,  UAF 2000-2001 
catalog) as follows:  
[[   ]] = Deletion
CAPS = ADDITION
LOCAL ADVANCED PLACEMENT CREDIT
FOREIGN LANGUAGE
After completing the course in which you were placed (above 101) and 
earning a B grade or higher, you may ask to receive [["bonus credit"]] 
CREDIT for the two immediately preceding prerequisite courses, if any.  
IN ADDITION, CREDIT (MAXIMUM 10) MAY BE RECEIVED IF THE COURSE 
WAS TAKEN AT AN ACCREDITED UNIVERSITY AND IS ACCEPTED AS 
EQUIVALENT TO AN APPROVED FOREIGN LANGUAGE COURSE AT UAF (B 
GRADE OR HIGHER).  However, credit cannot be awarded for such 
courses if university credit has already been granted for them (for 
example, through College Board Advanced Placement national tests) or 
special topics courses, individual study courses, and literature or culture 
courses.  CONTACT THE FOREIGN LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT.
	EFFECTIVE:  	Fall 2001
			Upon Chancellor Approval
	RATIONALE:  	The existing wording in the catalog permits a 
		UAF student who has foreign language expertise to receive 
		credit for the two immediately preceding prerequisite UAF 
		courses, if any, after completing the foreign language 
		course in which they were placed (above 101) and after 
		earning a B grade or higher.  This modification allows for 
		the same credit option to be available for students who 
		desire to transfer in credit from an accredited institution.
**
ATTACHMENT 99/6
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
SUBMITTED BY FACULTY APPEALS & OVERSIGHT
MOTION:
======
The UAF Faculty Senate moves to recommend to the UAF 
Administration that the following administrators be reviewed on a four 
year cycle according to the Guidelines outlined below:
	EFFECTIVE:  	Immediately
	RATIONALE: 	The Faculty Appeals and Oversight Committee 
		was tasked with reviewing the policy for the faculty's role 
		in the evaluation of administrators.  The primary 
		qualification for selection for periodic review by the 
		Provost's office was administrators holding academic 
		rank whose positions directly impact the academic 
		programs and whose performance directly affects the 
		ability of faculty to carry out their academic duties.
				****
GROUP "A"  
	Provost
	Executive Dean, College of Rural 91ÊÓÆµ
	Dean, School of Agriculture & Land Resource Management
	Dean, School of Fisheries & Ocean Sciences
	Dean, Graduate School
	Dean, School of Mineral Engineering
	Dean, School of Management
	Dean, School of Education
	Dean, College of Liberal Arts
	Dean, College of Science, Engineering & Math
GROUP "B"  
	Director, Geophysical Institute
	Director, Institute of Marine Science
	Director, Bristol Bay Campus
	Director, Chukchi Campus
	Director, Interior-Aleutians Campus
	Director, Tanana Valley Campus
	Director of Library
	Director, Institute of Arctic Biology
	Director, Institute of Northern Engineers
	Director, Kuskokwim Campus
	Director, Northwest Campus
	Director, 91ÊÓÆµ Cooperative Extension
	Director, Arctic Region Supercomputer Center
	Director, International Arctic Research Center
	Director, Fishery Industrial Technology Center, Kodiak
	Program Chairman, Marine Advisory Program
	Director of Fisheries Division, Juneau
Campus/Program Directors in Group "B" should be periodically reviewed 
by their immediate supervisory administrator according to a process 
established at the discretion of the supervising administrator.
Interim administrators who are still in place after four years should be 
considered for evaluation.  Administrators holding interim appointment 
will be evaluated in their fourth year according to the process outlined 
below.  Any administrator will be reviewed on an ad hoc basis when 
requested by 25 percent of the faculty in their unit.
			****
GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION PROCESS FOR ADMINISTRATORS
1. 	Within the first three weeks of the Fall Semester the 
	Supervisor of the Administrator to be reviewed will appoint 
	an Ad Hoc Administrator Review Committee consisting of 
	five members, at least three of whom must be faculty.  (It 
	is recommended that staff be included on the ad hoc 
	committee as appropriate.)  The chair of the committee 
	shall be appointed from the Faculty Senate.  One of the 
	three faculty shall be appointed from the Faculty Appeals 
	& Oversight Committee.
	In the case of evaluation of the Dean of the Graduate School, 
	the Provost will appoint an Ad Hoc Committee consisting 
	of two faculty drawn from the UAF Faculty Senate's 
	Graduate Academic & Advisory Committee, one Dean/
	Director, one member of the Faculty Appeals and 
	Oversight Committee, and a student representative 
	from the Graduate Student Organization.  
	The Ad Hoc Committee will solicit input from all relevant 
	constituencies on- and off-campus, including faculty, staff, 
	and students.  This may be accomplished through various 
	instruments, e.g., a standard questionnaire completed 
	anonymously and returned to the Committee Chair.
2. 	The Administrator to be evaluated will prepare a narrative 
	self-evaluation of activities performed during the three-year 
	period (academic years) prior to the year of evaluation or since 
	the last evaluation.  This narrative should include reflections 
	about how adequately s/he has fulfilled responsibilities of 
	leadership consistent with his/her own performance 
	expectations and those of faculty, staff, and students in 
	the unit.  Major or otherwise significant accomplishments 
	should be highlighted.  Any issues raised in the last evaluation 
	should be referenced with a view to what progress has been 
	made on those items.  Finally, the self-evaluation should 
	identify a limited set of reasonable goals for the unit over 
	the next three years, with some discussion about specific 
	strategies that may be undertaken through his/her 
	administrative leadership. 
3.  	The Ad Hoc Committee will interview a select sample of faculty, 
	staff, students and others as relevant for further evaluative 
	comments about the Administrator's performance.
4.  	The Ad Hoc Committee will interview the Administrator either 
	in person or by conference call.   The interview shall proceed 
	on the basis of a set of questions which reference the 
	Administrator's self-evaluation, the results of returned 
	questionnaires, and the interviews of faculty, staff, and 
	students.
5. 	The Ad Hoc Committee will prepare an evaluative summary, 
	and submit its report to the Provost (in the case of evaluation 
	of Deans) or to the Chancellor (in the case of evaluation of 
	the Provost or any other administrator who reports directly 
	to the Chancellor).  The Ad Hoc Committee shall work as 
	expeditiously as possible in completing its report and submit 
	it to the Provost or Chancellor as the case may be by March 
	15 of the Spring Semester.  
	(a) 	At a date to be set by the Provost, the Provost or 
		administrator's supervisor shall meet in joint conference 
		with the Ad Hoc Committee and the Faculty Appeals & 
		Oversight Committee for final review, recommendations, 
		and disposition of the Administrator�s evaluation.  The 
		supervisor of the administrator will thereafter provide 
		his/her formal evaluation taking into account the Ad Hoc 
		Committee's report. 
	(b) 	At a date to be set by the Chancellor, the Provost and 
		the Chancellor shall meet to discuss the Ad Hoc 
		Committee�s evaluation of the Provost.  During this 
		meeting the Chancellor and Provost shall identify 
		performance priorities for the next review period.  The 
		Chancellor shall meet in joint conference with the Ad Hoc 
		Committee and the UAF Faculty Senate�s Faculty Appeals 
		& Oversight Committee to summarize his evaluation.  
**
ATTACHMENT 99/7
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
Curricular Affairs Committee Meeting Report - Ron Illingworth, Chair
The Curricular Affairs committee held audioconferenced meetings on 
November 29, December 6, and January 24.  Our next meeting is 
scheduled for 7 February, 2001 from 1145-100 p.m.
All meetings are audioconferenced as well as face to face as several 
members of the committee are from outside Fairbanks.
We continued addressing prioritized issues from our list of issues for 
discussion this year.  
OLD ITEMS
Issue 1:	Course prerequisites � are they accurate and valid in the 
catalog and can they be enforced?
   Old Status:  	The Registrar's office has devised a memo which will 
be sent to each department and which will identify the prerequisites for 
each course listed in the catalog.  Departments will be requested to 
verify the validity and accuracy of these prerequisites.  Their input will 
be returned to the Registrar's office and the catalog updated.
Then, during registration, the Registrar's office will run a program which 
will check a student's records with the prerequisites listed for the 
course.  Students will not be restricted from classes solely on the basis 
of this computer generated sort.  However, questionable areas will be 
identified to the instructor for resolution before the beginning of the 
class.  This process will be beta tested in the Engineering Department 
before implementation.
   New Status:  	The listing has been sent to all departments for 
review and verification.  Prerequisite listings have been received by the 
Records office and the catalog is being updated as changes are 
received.  
Issue 2:	Status of formation of BAS oversight committee.
   Status:	This committee of the Faculty Senate has not yet been 
formed.  In its place several ad hoc committees are attempting to guide 
the development of the BAS.  This operation seems to be occurring 
outside of Senate intentions.  Senate leadership intervention appears to 
be necessary to either change the Senate position or to bring these ad 
hoc committees together under Senate leadership.
   New Status:	New directions in the School of Education have 
resulted in refocusing activities within the BAS.  We await School of Ed 
proposals in this area.
Issue 3:	Institutional integrity in the area of course offerings shown 
in the catalog
   Status:	Two different lists have been produced; one by Institutional 
Research and one from the Registrar's office.  There are differences 
between the two lists.
The Registrar's list will be provided, with a cover memo, to the College 
and School Deans for their distribution to their departments.  The listing 
contains courses which may be subject to consideration for 
removal/elimination based on their not having been offered since 1997.  
This will be an expedited process outside of the normal course approval 
process.  However, all recommendations will be reviewed by the 
Curriculum Review Committee prior to any removal/elimination action.
   New Status:	This listing has been provided to Deans and Directors 
and is in the process of being reviewed and returned.  Changes have 
been received from many departments and are being processed through 
the Curriculum Review committee.
Issue 4:	Transfer credit meeting core requirements for the AAS.
   Status:	A draft proposal is being created and will be presented at 
the next meeting of the Curricular Affairs Committee on 25 October, 
2000.  Existing policy covers the bachelor's degree but does not 
address students who possess a bachelor's degree from another 
institution and come to UAF to acquire an AAS.
   New Status:	Awaiting revision of the AAS degree.
Issue 5:	Minor student enrollment in University courses
   Status:	This is a carry-over from last years discussions.  The 
committee is agreed to the need for clarification of this policy.  A draft 
will be presented at the next Curricular Affairs Committee meeting on 
25 October, 2000.  Policies affecting both dual-enrollment and the 
AHEAD program are being reviewed.
   New Status:	Proposal for modification approved by committee and 
forwarded to Senate for consideration.  This proposal was approved by 
the Faculty Senate, and was scheduled for signature by the Chancellor 
the week of January 19th.
NEW ITEMS
Issue 6:	Proposed change to degree requirements
   Status:	Several degree changes were reviewed and approved with 
minor corrections as necessary.  Submitted to Senate for consideration.
   New Status:	These changes were approved by the Senate
Issue 7:	New Degrees
   Status:	Two new degrees were forwarded to the Senate and are on 
today's agenda for consideration.
Issue 8:	Revision to local advanced placement credit for foreign 
languages
   Status:	A revised proposal, submitted by the Foreign Language 
department was approved, with modification, and is submitted to 
today's Faculty Senate meeting for consideration.
Issue 9:	Distance Delivery Policies
   Status:	The Curricular Affairs committee decided to hold a series of 
open forum meetings for all of the UAF community with interests in this 
area.  Dates are to be determined but it is expected that meetings will 
be held no later than March.  Information acquired in these meetings will 
be used to help develop proposed policy in the area of distance delivery 
of courses at UAF.
**
ATTACHMENT 99/8
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
FACULTY AFFAIRS (FA) MEETING REPORT - Peter McRoy, Chair
24 January 2001
Committee Members Present:  M. Box, M. Davis (delayed), C.P. McRoy 
(chair), B. Mortensen, J. Wiens
Old Business:
The meeting basically consisted of a discussion of the agenda for the 
coming semester and the overall portfolio of the committee.  The 
committee will meet at this time on 21 Feb, 21 Mar, 11 Apr and as 
needed.
1.  Term Faculty Promotions:
This is a continuing item brought to the committee last semester by 
Dean Leipzig.  Mark Box will contact the Dean to arrange a meeting with 
the committee to bring the issue to resolution.
2.  Research Ethics Committee
An ad hoc sub-committee consisting of L. Duffy, T. DeLaca, P. McRoy 
(chair), M. Neumayr and N. Swazo, was appointed by the Administrative 
Committee to examine the compliance of UAF with federal regulations 
concerning ethics in research. 
3.  Research Faculty Membership 
The representation of research faculty on the Faculty Senate is a 
continuing issue that should be resolved this semester.
4.  Faculty Hire Procedures 
Some faculty members have raised comments over the procedures 
involved in search committees and hiring.  New rules are in place that 
are being enforced by the Equal Opportunities Office.  Dorothy Jones 
will be invited to a Faculty Affairs meeting to discuss procedures.
5.  Legislative Interaction
Mike Davis noted in our last meeting that this is a broad area of 
responsibility for Faculty Affairs under the Senate Bylaws.  Mike will take 
an active role in this area in collaboration with the faculty collective 
bargaining units during the legislative session. 
Other Items:  
An inquiry was raised concerning the PFD status of faculty on sabbatical 
leave.
**
ATTACHMENT 99/9
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
Graduate Advisory and Academic Committee - Jim Gardner, Chair
GAAC met December 4, 2000 and January 22, 2001.  Those attending 
the December meeting were Gimbel, Eicken, Kan, Mason, Murray, 
Lincoln, Lin, Sankaran, Konar, Richmond, and Gardner.  Those attending 
the January meeting were Gimbel, Eicken, Murray, Lincoln, Lin, Sankaran, 
Konar, Richmond, Gregory, Minassian and Gardner.
The December meeting focused on proposals for new/change Graduate 
courses and programs.  The committee voted to recommend approval 
of the Master's of Science (with project) in Statistics (which was 
approved by the Faculty Senate at their December 11th meeting.
The January meeting reviewed the status of new/change Graduate 
program proposals still pending, and began to  discuss a first draft of 
guidelines for the composition of Graduate Advisory Committees.  Hari 
Sankaran also volunteered to work with the Graduate School to 
review/revise definitions of Master's degrees.  No other business was 
discussed and the committee adjourned to bask in the warmth of an 
Arctic winter.
**
ATTACHMENT 99/10
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
Minutes of The Developmental Studies Committee, January 25, 2001
ATTENDING:  Nancy Ayagarak, John Bruder, Rich Carr, Jerah Chadwick, 
John Creed, Marty Getz, Cindy Hardy, Ron Illingworth, Wanda Martin, Joe 
Mason, Greg Owens, and Jane Weber
The committee met and discussed the following items:
ACCREDITATION:
Ron reported that he has gotten from PAIR an updated list of statistics 
from all areas of CRA and Developmental programs, which he will e-mail 
to members of the committee.  He expects to have the final draft of the 
report finished by the end of the week and will present it to the 
committee.  He noted a difference between how Developmental courses 
are taught on rural campuses and in Fairbanks.  At the rural campuses, 
these courses are taught by full-time faculty while on the Fairbanks 
campuses they are taught primarily by adjuncts and term faculty.  He 
will highlight this in his report.
EARLY WARNING:
Fred Dyen gave a presentation to the committee on the Early Warning 
Alert Program.  This program is designed to identify students who are at 
risk early in their academic career and to intervene on their behalf.  The 
program was designed based on information from national research, 
Banner, and professional organizations.  Fred reported that the program 
has already earmarked students, who attended during the fall of 99 but 
who did not return in the spring, for exit interviews to determine the 
factors that caused them to leave.  The key element of intervention for 
these students will be through advising.  Discussion of this presentation 
raised concerns with the differences in risk factors between rural and 
urban students, the definition of who is and is not a freshman student 
(i.e.:  what about high school students taking UAF classes or transfer 
students?), and the difficulties of students who have been denied 
eligibility for financial aid.
MARCH 5 MEETING WITH HAMILTON:
We discussed the issues we will present to President Hamilton at our 
March 5 meeting.  Our primary intent is to inform him of our concern 
with the number of students, including UA Scholars who are entering the 
university with math , reading, and writing levels below the levels we 
address.  Additional suggestions for related topics include discussion of 
the PRAXIS exam and the High School graduation exam (this may be 
moot at the moment).  We will give him a summary of information on 
students entering our program to read over before he comes to meet 
with us.  Wanda may be able to pull this information out of the data for 
the Early Warning Program.
Jane and Cindy will draft a memo to Ralph Gabrielli from the entire 
committee requesting funding for John Creed and Nancy Ayagarak to 
attend this meeting.  Joe Mason and John Bruder will be in Fairbanks for 
the Faculty Senate meeting, so will be able to attend.  Jerah Chadwick 
will not be able to attend.
FUTURE MEETINGS:
We will meet twice before the Monday, March 5 10:30-12:30 meeting:
Thursday, February 15, 2:00-3:30pm
Thursday March 1, 2:00-3:30pm.
**
ATTACHMENT 99/11
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
Report of the fourth meeting of the Faculty Appeals and Oversight 
Committee (1/19/01), 	Chancellor�s Conference Room: 1.30pm-2.30pm
Present:  Godwin A. Chukwu, SME; Victoria Joan Moessner, CLA; Brian 
Himelbloom, SFOS/FITC; Mitch Roth, CSEM; Madeline Schatz, CLA
Absent:  Kristy Long, CRA/ACE; Dennis Schall, SOED; Rick Steiner, SFOS-
MAP; Oscar Kawagley, SOE; Ed Husted, CRA; George Khazanov, CSEM
OLD BUSINESS
Minutes of the faculty Appeals & Oversight Committee meeting of 
11/16/00  were read.
NEW  BUSSINESS. 
 
Godwin Chukwu (Committee Chair) briefed the committee on the earlier 
meeting he had with the Chancellor, the Provost, UAF Senate president 
& president�elect (Larry Duffy and Norm Swazo, respectively) regarding  
(a)  motion to approve guidelines for the evaluation of Administrators, 
(b)  motion to approve list of Administrators.  Both the Chancellor  and 
the Provost suggested some changes to the motions.
The committee discussed amendments to both motions but could not 
vote on them due to lack of quorum.  It was agreed to circulate the 
discussed/suggested amendments to all members for review and 
comments after which the committee�s recommendation would be 
forwarded to the Administrative committee of the Faculty Senate.
The motions are part of the agenda.  
**
ATTACHMENT 99/12
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
Faculty Development, Assessment & Improvement Committee Meeting 
Report 
The Faculty Development, Assessment & Improvement committee held 
it's meeting on November 21, 2000 as an audio-conference from 11:30 
- 12:30 in the Chancellor's Conference Room.  Those present:  J. Collins, 
B. Cooper, L. Curda, R. Dupras, D. McLean-Nelson, J. Morrison, E. T. 
Robinson, A. Rybkin, C. Price.  Absent:  B. Butcher and R. Norris-Tull.  
Five items were circulated prior to the meeting:  Memo to Provost, IAS; 
Motion/resolution; J. Morrison report; minutes of the last meeting; and 
the agenda. 
The committee was called to order and introductions were made.  The 
minutes of the 10/17/00 meeting were accepted as presented with the 
correction of noting Carol Gold was also in attendance.  The chair is to 
contact Carol Gold as to her willingness to serve as a member. 
The meeting time for the spring semester was discussed with all those 
present agreeing that our current day [Tuesday] and time [11:30-
12:30] worked well. 
The SAI memo that was drafted by the chair and sent to the Provost 
was reviewed.  Having temporary drop boxes in major teaching areas 
was discussed.  Rheba Dupras reported that library courses need to 
have drop locations available at numerous times during a semester.  Jim 
Collins noted that the requirement for drop boxes being available 
outside designated offices for the return of the SAI surveys generates a 
fire code problem.  Linda Curda noted that the current system is not 
working for distance courses.  Bottom line here is that we need to 
continue to work in this area and develop a better system.
Joy Morrison reported on the schedule of faculty development activities 
and discussed help received from UAA and their presentation on 
education management in higher education.  Discussion within the 
committee included the need to stress teaching excellence, the need to 
put more resources into faculty development, and the need to provide 
for a permanent director of faculty development.  To aid teaching 
excellence the discussion noted the desire to gain insight to a course 
mid-term.  A feedback questionnaire could involve:
1. What do you like most about this course?
2. What do you like least about this course?
3. What recommendation(s) would you make for improvement in this 
course?
4. What can you do to improve your performance in this course?
Teaching awards and sharing the positive approaches to teaching were 
noted as very desirable.
The up-coming American Association for Higher Education (AAHE) 
annual conference was noted.  This conference will be held at the 
beginning of February and will include a contingent from UAF.  In 
addition to Joy Morrison, our committee member Jim Collins will attend 
as a team leader.  The need to share the results of such participation 
was noted and will be addressed.
The next meeting is to be held at 11:30 -12:30, Tuesday, January 23, 
2001. The location will be Rasmuson Library, Room 341.  It should be 
noted that the committee welcomes and invites interested faculty to 
join the membership.  Contact the governance office (7964) or chair, E 
T Robinson at 6526 or ffetr@uaf.edu.
The meeting was adjourned.  Respectfully submitted, E. Thomas 
Robinson
**
ATTACHMENT 99/13
UAF FACULTY SENATE #99
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
SUBMITTED BY ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
ACADEMIC LIAISON FACULTY FELLOW CALL FOR NOMINATIONS
The Faculty Alliance and the President of the University of 91ÊÓÆµ are 
calling for nominations for the position of Faculty Fellow in the Office of 
the President for up to one year beginning July 1, 2001.  A description 
of the position and the selection process follows below.
Nominations may be made by the applicant, by another faculty member, 
or by an administrator within the university system.  Nomination packet 
should consist of a completed nomination form (??), a letter of 
nomination summarizing the nominee�s abilities relative to the position, 
three references, and a current curriculum vita.
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: THURSDAY, MARCH 1, 2001
Nomination packets should be submitted to the nominee�s local faculty 
governance leader, listed below.
Jim Liszka    		Larry Duffy    		Dave Marvel
ACADEMIC LIAISON FACULTY FELLOW POSITION DESCRIPTION
An Academic Liaison Faculty Fellow in the President's office gives the 
President, the Statewide Academic Council, and the Faculty Alliance a 
faculty voice in academic and administrative decision making.
LENGTH OF APPOINTMENT: Up to one year beginning July 1.
DUTIES:
	1)  To serve as an academic advisor to the President and other 
statewide administrators; this includes providing a view of academic 
issues and traditions.  The Faculty Fellow will have no supervisory 
authority.
	2)  To facilitate and improve inter-MAU communication with 
faculty on systemwide academic issues.
	3)  To serve as an ex-officio member of the Faculty Alliance.
	4)  To serve as liaison to the Systemwide Academic Council.
	5)  To serve as an ex-officio member of the Distance Education 
Council.
	6)  To take on special projects as agreed to by both the Alliance 
and the President.  Such projects should be in line with the primary 
nature of this position.
COMPENSATION and REIMBURSEMENT:
The Fellow will retain his or her current position with the University of 
91ÊÓÆµ while on this special assignment.  The President�s Office will 
assume the responsibility of paying the Fellow�s contract, with any 
necessary contract extensions from a nine month base.
If the Fellow lives outside of the Fairbanks area, moving expenses to and 
from Fairbanks will be reimbursed in accordance with University 
Regulation 05.02.06.
Reasonable housing and local telephone costs will be reimbursed if the 
Fellow comes from outside the area.  When feasible, the Fellow will live 
in UAF Faculty housing.
Authorized travel related to Faculty Fellow duties will be reimbursed.
An equipped office will be provided for the Fellow�s use, including a 
computer and telephone.
SELECTION PROCESS
	1)  The Faculty Alliance, serving as the selection committee, will 
honor the diverse characteristics of the faculty in recommending to the 
President and the Systemwide Academic Council a minimum of two and 
not more than four faculty whom they fully support for the position.  
The Alliance will begin their deliberations at their meeting scheduled for 
March 6, 2001 and will make their recommendations no later than 
Friday, March 16, 2001.
	2)  To the extent possible, an effort will be made to rotate the 
position among MAUs as well as bipartite and tripartite faculty, and to 
have it reflect the diverse characteristics of the faculty.  Whenever 
practical, the Faculty Fellow and the Chair of the Alliance will be from 
different MAUs.
	3)  The President will select the candidate and offer the 
appointment by Friday, April 6, 2001, and, if the appointment is 
accepted, will buy out the successful candidate's contract for up to one 
year, starting July 1, 2001.
  UA