Katherine Schexneider Arctic Climate Science Award

Updated Fall 2026

Arctic Sea Ice

The Katherine Schexneider Arctic Climate Science Award recognizes outstanding graduate students and early-career researchers whose work advances understanding of Arctic and sub-Arctic climate systems. The award supports research that demonstrates excellence, feasibility, and clear relevance to climate science and/or climate change in high northern ecosystems.

Projects should contribute meaningfully to Arctic/sub-Arctic research through innovative methods, strong scientific design, and potential for real-world impact. Up to $5000 in funding may support travel, supplies, tuition, or other allowable research expenses.

Applicants must meet the following criteria:

  • Be a current graduate student in good-academic standing or an early-career researcher within five years of completing their degree at the University of 91ÊÓÆµ Fairbanks
  • Conduct research directly related to Arctic or sub-Arctic climate science, including but not limited to climate change, engineering applications, or ecosystem processes.

Preference may be given to applicants:

  • With a clear Arctic fieldwork component
  • Without significant alternative funding sources
  • Whose work promotes interdisciplinary collaboration or diversity across UAF units
  • Award Amount: Variable; typically supports research-related expenses such as travel, fieldwork, supplies, or tuition.

  • Funding Period: Awards are intended to support projects within the academic year or up to 12 months from the start date.

  • Use of Funds: Recipients must adhere to UAF and sponsor guidelines; allowable costs include research materials, data collection, travel, and dissemination activities.

  • Reporting: Awardees will submit a brief progress or final report summarizing outcomes, expenditures, and impacts on their professional development.

Applications will be evaluated on a rolling basis using the Katherine Schexneider Arctic Climate Science Award Rubric, which assesses:

  • Relevance to Arctic/Sub-Arctic Focus (25%)

  • Scientific and Scholarly Merit (20%)

  • Feasibility and Budget (20%)

  • Applicant Qualifications and Potential (20%)

  • Professional Development Potential (15%)


Top-rated proposals will demonstrate strong alignment with Arctic research priorities, methodological rigor, and clear potential for academic and community impact.